The Spark of Innovation

Inside the Biosensors Best Paper Award 2015

Celebrating Scientific Excellence in Biosensor Technology

Introduction: Celebrating Scientific Excellence

Imagine a device that detects deadly diseases from a single drop of blood, identifies environmental pollutants in seconds, or monitors food safety right in your kitchen. This isn't science fiction—it's the world of biosensors, where biology meets cutting-edge technology. In 2015, the journal Biosensors launched its inaugural Best Paper Award to spotlight breakthroughs accelerating this revolution. These awards didn't just honor brilliant science; they showcased innovations poised to transform healthcare, environmental monitoring, and diagnostics 1 4 .

This article delves into the award-winning research, unravels a landmark experiment, and explores how these discoveries continue to shape our world.

Biosensors Impact

Revolutionizing diagnostics with rapid, affordable solutions

Decoding Biosensors: The Science Behind the Magic

What Makes a Biosensor Tick?

A biosensor is a miniaturized detective. It combines:

  1. Biological Recognition Element: Enzymes, antibodies, or DNA that latch onto specific targets (e.g., a virus or toxin).
  2. Transducer: Converts the biological "signal" into a measurable output (e.g., electrical current or light).
  3. Reader Device: Translates the output into user-friendly data 7 .
The 2015 Winners
  • 1st Prize: Fluorescence Lateral Flow Assays
  • 2nd Prize: Organic Transistors
  • 3rd Prize: Paper-Based Electrodes

Selected for scientific rigor, innovation, and citation potential by global experts 1 4 .

Why the Award Mattered

Biosensors journal, a Q1 leader in analytical chemistry and instrumentation 2 , created this award to highlight research with real-world impact. The winners were selected from 2013–2014 publications based on scientific rigor, innovation, and citation potential by a committee of global experts, including Prof. Ashok Mulchandani (UC Riverside) and Prof. Nicole Jaffrezic-Renault (CNRS, France) 4 .

Spotlight Experiment: The First-Prize Fluorescence Breakthrough

The Challenge

Traditional lateral flow assays (LFAs)—think rapid COVID tests—are affordable but lack sensitivity. False negatives can delay critical treatment. Linda G. Lee's team aimed to fix this by adding fluorescence detection to standard LFAs, creating a system that's both cheap and precise 1 4 .

Methodology: Step by Step

  1. Biological Design: Antibodies specific to target biomarkers were tagged with fluorescent nanoparticles and embedded on nitrocellulose test strips.
  2. Hardware Innovation: A portable reader with LED excitation sources and photodiodes detected faint fluorescence signals.
  3. Testing Protocol: Samples were applied to the strip and biomarker concentration was quantified via fluorescence intensity within 15 minutes 1 .
Biosensor research
Fluorescence Detection System

The award-winning innovation that combined affordability with laboratory-grade accuracy.

Table 1: Cost and Performance Comparison
Parameter Traditional LFA Lee et al.'s System
Sensitivity 70–85% >95%
Cost per Test $0.50 $2.00
Time to Result 10–20 min 15 min
Equipment Cost — <$500
Table 2: Detection Limits for Disease Biomarkers
Biomarker Application Detection Limit
Cardiac Troponin Heart Attack Diagnosis 0.01 ng/mL
C-reactive Protein Inflammation Monitoring 5 pg/mL
HIV p24 Antigen Infectious Disease 10 IU/mL
Key Innovation

This work bridged the gap between point-of-care affordability and laboratory accuracy, achieving >95% sensitivity at just $2 per test with equipment costing less than $500 1 .

The Winning Trio: Technologies Shaping the Future

1st Prize
Fluorescence Lateral Flow Assays

Linda G. Lee's team enhanced low-cost diagnostic strips with lab-grade accuracy using fluorescent nanoparticles and portable readers 1 4 .

>95% sensitivity
2nd Prize
Organic Transistors

Scherrine Tria's team used living intestinal cells on organic transistors to monitor tissue barrier health in real-time for drug safety testing 1 4 .

Real-time monitoring
3rd Prize
Paper-Powered Diagnostics

Petri Ihalainen's group created gold nanoparticle-coated paper electrodes detecting diseases like malaria for under $0.10 per strip 1 4 .

<$0.10 per test

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essentials for Biosensor Innovation

Table 3: Key Research Reagent Solutions
Reagent/Material Function Example in 2015 Winning Papers
Gold Nanoparticles Signal amplification; visual/electrical readout Used in paper electrodes (3rd Prize)
Fluorescent Dyes High-sensitivity detection Core to LFA innovation (1st Prize)
Cell Cultures Live tissue barrier modeling Organic transistor sensors (2nd Prize)
Cellulose Paper Low-cost, porous substrate Base for printed electrodes (3rd Prize)
Antibodies/Aptamers Target-specific binding All winning studies

Legacy and Future Horizons

The Impact of the 2015 Awards

The 2015 awards catalyzed a decade of progress:

  • Journal Impact: Biosensors saw citations/document surge from 3.18 (2016) to 6.32 (2024), reflecting field growth 2 .
  • Technology Evolution: Lee's fluorescence system paved the way for smartphone-integrated diagnostics (e.g., 2025 IECB award winners 6 ).
  • New Frontiers: Winners like Dr. Seda Nur Topkaya (2015 Lindau Nobel attendee) now pioneer CRISPR-based sensors for cancer detection 3 .
Current Trends

The biosensor field continues to evolve with wearable biosensors, AI-driven analysis, and nanomaterial-enhanced systems—all tracing their roots to these foundational works 6 7 .

Conclusion: A Decade of Diagnostic Transformation

The Biosensors Best Paper Award 2015 wasn't just about accolades; it spotlighted ingeniously simple solutions to global health challenges. From paper strips to cellular transistors, these studies proved that sensitivity need not sacrifice accessibility. As we enter an era of personalized medicine and climate-resilient monitoring, the lessons from 2015—emphasizing affordability, scalability, and user-centric design—remain more vital than ever.

"The best biosensors are those that disappear into everyday life, quietly guarding our health."

Prof. Michael Thompson, Award Committee 4

References